Skip to main content

Grain Size Distribution Analysis


Grain Size Distribution Analysis is usually employed in sedimentology. It is employed to determine the size of the different grains that make up a sedimentary rock or soil unit under consideration.


From the analysis, the following can be deduced:

            The sortability of the grains;

            The environment of deposition (Paleoenvironmental reconstruction);

            The energy of deposition (Paleocurrent current reconstruction);

            Transportation agent.

Please note that this analysis does not in any way show / determine the mineralogical composition of the rock / soil unit.

Grain sizes range from gravel (conglomerates and coarser particles) to clay (fine particles). It is determined by its diameter and measured in millimeters (mm), micrometers (µm) or phi (ø).

Below are the soils ranges (in mm):
            Boulders                                              >200
            Cobbles                                               63-200
            Gravel
(Coarse)                                  20-63
                        (Medium)                                6.3-20
                         (Fine)                                      2 - 6.3
            Sand
                        (Coarse)                                  0.63-2
                        (Medium)                                0.2-0.63
                        (Fine)                                       0.063-0.02
            Silt
                        (Coarse)                                  0.02-0.063
                        (Medium)                                0.006-0.02
                        (Fine)                                       0.002-0.006
            Clay                                                     <0.002


It is worth noting that no particular grain size exists naturally. It always exists as mixtures / intercalations e.g silty-clay, silty-sand. However, a particular grain size usually dominates the other.


Whenever Grain size (or Particle size) distribution analysis is mentioned, what usually comes to the mind is sieve analysis. Sieve analysis is the rudimentary part of grain size distribution analysis. Other methods exist. Examples are:

            Laser Diffraction

            Dynamic Light Scattering

            Sedimentation


Sieve Analysis
Just as the name implies ‘sieve analysis’. It is the passage of a weighted amount of soil (usually dried) through a set of sieves with known diameters. The coarses settle on the sieves while the fines pass through to the next sieve till the finest which settles in the tray. It has its pros and cons. It is cheap and easy to operate manually. But it burns the energy of the operator as a result of the constant and vigorous shaking required.

Laser diffraction:
This measures the angular dependence of laser light scattered by particles. It does not require a sieve analysis first. It is done in situ and always accurate. It has the capacity of detecting particle sizes of <100nm to 3mm.

Dynamic Light Scattering:
This measures the intensity of scattered light variations due to Brownian motion of particles in suspension. It is usually accurate and suitable for very fine particles (<1nm – 1µm).

Sedimentation:
It measures the rate of sedimentation of soil particles in water. It is used for very fine soil particles.


Laser diffraction and dynamic light scattering techniques are newer methods and are more accurate.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE AGE OF THE EARTH - THE OLDEST MAN ON EARTH IS THE EARTH

THE AGE OF THE EARTH Hey … Just as we celebrate our birthdays to commemorate the day we were born, has it ever occurred to you to ponder on the age of the earth? Don’t you think that there was a day (way back) when the earth was formed? Don’t get it twisted!!! This is no myth. It is a reality. It is REAL!!! The Earth is approximately 4.6 billion years old!!! Sounds absurd??? Well, this figure did not come as a result of fiction or imagination – but by radiometric dating in the early 20 th century. Lead in uranium-rich minerals when dated by early scientists,  were able to discover that they were billions of years old. Another pointer to this is that small crystals of Zircon obtained from Jack Hills, Western Australia when dated, was around 4.4 billion years old. One may ask: “How is this possible”? Rocks are aggregate of minerals. Some of these minerals have radioactive elements like Uranium and Thorium. In the process of their decay (radioactive

Lead in Drinking / Groundwater

Possible sources of lead in groundwater Places well known for lead-zinc (Pb-zn) deposits are in danger of having their groundwater contaminated with Lead. Lead is a known silent killer especially in infants and children as it has high affinity for Hemoglobin. Another reason it is a silent killer is because it accumulates (bioaccumulation) in the body gradually stealthily. The fatality of lead is that it gets stored in the bones (as Calcium is stored) and becomes part of the body. From there, it gets released directly into the body. Pregnant and nursing women are the most hit because the Calcium which their bodies require for the growth of the fetus and for breast milk production may be mixed with Lead. The detrimental effects of lead are enormous and felt among infants / children, pregnant women and adults. Among the children , these (but not limited to the following) are pronounced: Ø   Anemia Ø   Slowed / stunted growth Ø   Poor body development Ø   Poor i

COMPARISON BETWEEN SCHLUMBERGER ARRAY OVER WENNER ARRAY

COMPARISON   BETWEEN SCHLUMBERGER ARRAY OVER WENNER ARRAY Find below the pros and cons of Schlumberger Array over Wenner Array and vice versa Are you a young geologist? Click HERE NOW!!! Advantages of using Schlumberger Array over Wenner                 It requires less manpower and time than Wenner soundings.                 It is less sensitive to lateral variations in resistivity. The potential electrodes are moved only occasionally; In a Wenner sounding the potential and the current electrodes are always moved after each measurement. It is faster in field operation. Types of VES Curves Requires less physical movement of electrodes than the normal Wenner array because only the current electrodes must be moved between readings. The effects of near surface, lateral inhomogeneities are less on Schlumberger measurements when compared to Wenner measurements. In industrial areas, stray currents and telluric currents that a