Skip to main content

Grain Size Distribution Analysis


Grain Size Distribution Analysis is usually employed in sedimentology. It is employed to determine the size of the different grains that make up a sedimentary rock or soil unit under consideration.


From the analysis, the following can be deduced:

            The sortability of the grains;

            The environment of deposition (Paleoenvironmental reconstruction);

            The energy of deposition (Paleocurrent current reconstruction);

            Transportation agent.

Please note that this analysis does not in any way show / determine the mineralogical composition of the rock / soil unit.

Grain sizes range from gravel (conglomerates and coarser particles) to clay (fine particles). It is determined by its diameter and measured in millimeters (mm), micrometers (µm) or phi (ø).

Below are the soils ranges (in mm):
            Boulders                                              >200
            Cobbles                                               63-200
            Gravel
(Coarse)                                  20-63
                        (Medium)                                6.3-20
                         (Fine)                                      2 - 6.3
            Sand
                        (Coarse)                                  0.63-2
                        (Medium)                                0.2-0.63
                        (Fine)                                       0.063-0.02
            Silt
                        (Coarse)                                  0.02-0.063
                        (Medium)                                0.006-0.02
                        (Fine)                                       0.002-0.006
            Clay                                                     <0.002


It is worth noting that no particular grain size exists naturally. It always exists as mixtures / intercalations e.g silty-clay, silty-sand. However, a particular grain size usually dominates the other.


Whenever Grain size (or Particle size) distribution analysis is mentioned, what usually comes to the mind is sieve analysis. Sieve analysis is the rudimentary part of grain size distribution analysis. Other methods exist. Examples are:

            Laser Diffraction

            Dynamic Light Scattering

            Sedimentation


Sieve Analysis
Just as the name implies ‘sieve analysis’. It is the passage of a weighted amount of soil (usually dried) through a set of sieves with known diameters. The coarses settle on the sieves while the fines pass through to the next sieve till the finest which settles in the tray. It has its pros and cons. It is cheap and easy to operate manually. But it burns the energy of the operator as a result of the constant and vigorous shaking required.

Laser diffraction:
This measures the angular dependence of laser light scattered by particles. It does not require a sieve analysis first. It is done in situ and always accurate. It has the capacity of detecting particle sizes of <100nm to 3mm.

Dynamic Light Scattering:
This measures the intensity of scattered light variations due to Brownian motion of particles in suspension. It is usually accurate and suitable for very fine particles (<1nm – 1µm).

Sedimentation:
It measures the rate of sedimentation of soil particles in water. It is used for very fine soil particles.


Laser diffraction and dynamic light scattering techniques are newer methods and are more accurate.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

COMPARISON BETWEEN SCHLUMBERGER ARRAY OVER WENNER ARRAY

COMPARISON   BETWEEN SCHLUMBERGER ARRAY OVER WENNER ARRAY Find below the pros and cons of Schlumberger Array over Wenner Array and vice versa Are you a young geologist? Click HERE NOW!!! Advantages of using Schlumberger Array over Wenner                 It requires less manpower and time than Wenner soundings.                 It is less sensitive to lateral variations in resistivity. The potential electrodes are moved only occasionally; In a Wenner sounding the potential and the current electrodes are always moved after each measurement. It is faster in field operation. Types of VES Curves Requires less physical movement of electrodes than the normal Wenner array because only the current electrodes must be moved between readings. The effects of near surface, lateral inhomoge...

Vasquez Rocks

Have you heard of Vasquez Rock? Credit: The above picture will be alien except to those within the vicinity of Aqua Dulce, California or perhaps, those that have visited here at one time or the other. Just watch the arcs and the angles formed by this deposit!! In case you do not know, the image you are seeing is Vasquez Rocks. Am fascinated about the arcs and the acute angles formed by this deposit.. Your groundwater may be polluted!!! Nature is indeed wonderful!!!! For emphasis sake, this is in Aqua Dulce, California, north of Los Angeles. Research has it that the ‘arcs’ formed (i.e. tilting was as a result of the North American Plate collision with the Pacific Plate) along the San Andreas fault. We can see that the collision resulted in the uplift.

Principles and limitations geophysical method of exploration

Geophysics simply means the application of principles of physics in the study of the earth. The application of geophysics is vast. It can be used to study the entire Earth (Global geophysics), or for localized survey of the crust e.g for Engineering purposes. Geophysical survey is broadly classified into two based on the source of energy. 1.        Natural field: This uses the electric, magnetic,  electromagnetic and gravitational fields of the Earth 2.        Artificial source: Involves the generation of artificial electrical or electromagnetic fields into the earth by a means of a D.C. Magnetic method is applied when searching for buried magnetite ores because of their high magnetic susceptibility. Electrical method is used when exploring for ground water because rocks resistances differ according to their water saturation levels. Seismic method is used for hydrocarbon exploration. It is worth noti...